My PCR-free libraries do not look as expected on the Bioanalyzer. How should I QC PCR-free libraries?

Illumina sequencing libraries are usually generated with Y-adapters. These are partly single-stranded and partly double stranded.
A PCR-free library will thus still contain partly single-stranded regions.  These single-stranded regions can lead to several types of Bioanalyzer artifacts.  Most commonly the libraries will appear about 70 to 100 nucleotides longer than expected.  However, we have also encountered PCR-free libraries that ran as shorter molecules as well as dramatically longer molecules.  We have (very rarely) encountered another significant problem: considerable amounts adapter-dimers were not visible on the Bioanalyzer traces of PCR-free libraries.

To accurately QC PCR-free Illumina libraries we recommend the following approach:
–  Take a 1 ul aliquot of your library and run a short PCR (e.g. 6 cycles) with this aliquot.
–  Clean up the PCR reaction with a spin column ( e.g. Qiagen Qiaquick, Zymo DNA -clean, …); do NOT use Ampure beads.
–  Run the cleaned up PCR product on the Bioanalyzer again as well as the original PCR-free library.
The Bioanalyzer trace of the PCR product will represent the true molecule sizes and the true adapter-dimer content the closest.

Is PCR-free library preparation still advantageous?
If we generate PCR-free libraries in our lab, the described additional QC steps for PCR-free libraries will necessitate significant additional costs for the library preparation. Please see the prices for the PCR-free Add-on.
A great alternative to preparing the libraries completely PCR-free is the use of a single PCR cycle instead. This combines the advantages of both: fully double-stranded library molecules can be used for the library QC and there will be no or only an extremely low PCR-bias introduced. Our recommendation is to submit the same amount of  DNA sample as for PCR-free library preps (1 ug or more) and then only apply the single cycle of amplification.

In general, the original grave concerns about library PCR amplification (presented in papers from 2011) are no longer very relevant.  This is due to the use of modern polymerases that are designed for complex samples like Kapa HiFi,  NEB Q5, or QIAseq HiFi polymerase.  The previous “standard”, the high-fidelity Phusion enzyme had tremendous disadvantages for complex samples (Quail et al. 2012 Optimal enzymes for amplifying sequencing libraries. Nature Methods volume 9, pages10–11(2012) ).

Category: 04 Library Preparation and QC

Posted in
Latest Tweets
  • What are your experiences with the Formulatrix Mantis dispenser? Is the accuracy sufficient for 1ul dispenses for s… ,
  • UC Davis is looking for a director for its compute facility (High-Performance Computing Core Facility - HPCCF). Al… ,
  • BTW, thanks also to our expert Ruta Sahasrabudhe, , at the DNA Technologies Core for the first (or… ,